Close Menu
Business

Corezing com: Legal Records and Public Info

corezing com

If you typed “corezing com” into Google, you’re probably trying to figure out what this company is—and whether you should trust them. Let’s cut through the noise and look at what actual government documents say.

Who Is Corezing International, Really?

First thing you need to know: they use a bunch of different names. Corezing International Pte Ltd, Corezing Technology, CoreZing Electronics, Core Zing, Corezing International Group Company—the list goes on. That alone raises eyebrows when you’re doing business due diligence.

Their addresses are all over the map: Singapore (Bukit Batok, Woodlands, East Coast Road), Hong Kong (Kwun Tong, Kowloon Bay, Mongkok), plus Shenzhen and Dongguan in mainland China. No single HQ, just a network of locations. For anyone checking suppliers, that’s a red flag—makes it harder to pin down who’s actually accountable.

The 2011 Entity List Bombshell

In October 2011, the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) dropped the hammer. They added Corezing International and several individuals to the Entity List—that’s basically a “do not trade” blacklist for U.S. exports.

Why? The Federal Register lays it out plainly: they shipped 6,000 radio frequency modules from the United States to Iran, routing them through Singapore. Some of those modules later turned up in improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in Iraq. This isn’t rumor—the Commerce Department explicitly stated Corezing used “deceptive actions, including shifting/circuitous routes and false or omitted information on shipping documentation.”

When a company lands on the Entity List, U.S. firms need a special license to sell them anything—and those licenses are basically never approved. It’s a death sentence for legal trade with American suppliers.

Criminal Convictions: The 2014 Guilty Pleas

This is where it gets really serious. Two Singapore nationals, Hia Soo Gan Benson and Lim Kow Seng, pleaded guilty in Washington D.C. federal court for conspiring to violate the Arms Export Control Act. Court papers show they illegally exported 55 military-grade antennas—cavity-backed spiral and biconical types—from Massachusetts to Singapore and Hong Kong without State Department licenses.

These aren’t consumer electronics. They’re classified as U.S. munitions for airborne and shipboard military systems. The plea agreement carried potential sentences of up to five years in prison, $250,000 fines, and three years supervised release. Corezing International itself was named as the corporate entity behind the scheme.

The Temporary Denial Order: Complete Shutdown

BIS didn’t stop at the Entity List. They issued a 180-day Temporary Denial Order—a full nuclear option in export enforcement. This order blocked Corezing and its network from “any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology exported or to be exported from the United States.”

The document lists dozens of addresses and aliases, essentially saying: if you even suspect you’re dealing with these folks, walk away. No U.S. company could legally sell to them, ship to them, or even facilitate a transaction.

What This Means for Your Business

Look, I get it—you might have seen Corezing on an old supplier list, or maybe they’re pitching you a deal now. Here’s the hard truth: any company with this documented history carries massive compliance risk.

If you’re a procurement manager, compliance officer, or business owner, you need to ask:

  • Are we absolutely sure this is a different Corezing?
  • Can they prove clean ownership and management?
  • Have they addressed these violations publicly?

The burden of proof is on them, not you. With this track record, most compliance teams would just move on to another vendor.

How to Verify Everything Yourself

Don’t just trust what I wrote—go straight to the sources. I’ve linked them below, but here’s where to find them:

  • Federal Register: Search “2011-28057” for the Entity List notice (October 31, 2011)
  • gov: Look up the November 18, 2014 press release about the guilty pleas
  • gov: Find the Temporary Denial Order PDF (document e2143)

These are primary government sources, not news reports or blogs. If you’re making a business decision, read the originals.

FAQs

Q1: Is corezing com the same as Corezing International mentioned in export violations?

A: Based on public records, Corezing International operated under multiple aliases with addresses in Singapore and Hong Kong. Without direct access to current domain registration, we can’t confirm if corezing com was their official site, but the name matches exactly.

Q2: What specific products did they illegally export?

A: Court documents cite military antennas (cavity-backed spiral, biconical) and over 6,000 radio frequency modules. Some modules were later recovered from improvised explosive devices in Iraq.

Q3: Can U.S. companies legally do business with Corezing entities now?

A: No. The 2011 Entity List addition and subsequent Temporary Denial Order prohibit any transactions involving U.S.-origin items without explicit BIS approval. These restrictions remain active.

Q4: How long were the prison sentences for the individuals involved?

A: The two Singapore nationals pleaded guilty to charges carrying a maximum of five years imprisonment, $250,000 fines, and three years supervised release. Final sentencing details are in the court records.

Q5: Where can I verify this information independently?

A: Check the Federal Register (2011-28057), ICE.gov news releases from November 2014, and the Bureau of Industry Security’s Temporary Denial Order PDF. All are primary government sources.

References: